Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-08: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Section 3.1 -- A DNS server that supports DNS-over-TLS MUST listen for and accept TCP connections on port 853. By mutual agreement with its clients, the server MAY, instead, use a port other than 853 for DNS-over-TLS. Is it really "instead" (in which case the previous sentence isn't unqualified "MUST"), or is it "in addition? That is, which of these is correct?: NEW-1 A DNS server that supports DNS-over-TLS MUST listen for and accept TCP connections on port 853. By mutual agreement with its clients, the server MAY, in addition, use a port other than 853 for DNS-over-TLS. END NEW-2 A DNS server that supports DNS-over-TLS MUST listen for and accept TCP connections on port 853, unless it has mutual agreement with its clients to use a port other than 853 for DNS-over-TLS. END (And similarly for the client side in the following paragraph.) _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
