On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do like the simplicity and clarity of your proposal, but relying on > client-side libraries to be fixed seems like a non-starter, > unfortunately. This is the classic IETF problem for any protocol with a > deployed base; the folks who have the incentive and capacity to fix some > endpoints aren't necessarily the folks who control the "right" endpoints > to fix :/ > Based on my reading of the charter, I think it's within the remit of this WG to have a short I-D recommending random shuffling of RRs, permitting fixed order, but "MUST NOT" for cyclic. For both recursive, and authoritative servers. Happy to do it if folks don't think it's crazy. -- Colm
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
