Terry, I think it's weird that we have people who have ideas about needed standardization work, and we insist that they work outside of a chartered working group.
I tend to think that recursive-to-authority privacy work should be done in dprive, but if that working group needs to wait for the standards they have developed to "bake", then okay. We should work towards a BoF for a new working group then, right? Cheers, -- Shane At 2016-07-19 07:27:13 +0000 Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for starting to enumerate the options/problems related to recursive > resolver to authoritative name server. > > As AD, I would very much like to see some operational data points and some > experience from 'the wild' of deployment to better inform a (re)charter > discussion. > > That said, I am VERY interested to see individuals start work (as you have > done) and continue to work in parallel with the above goals. > > Cheers > Terry > > On 19/07/2016, 6:25 AM, "dns-privacy on behalf of Stephane Bortzmeyer" > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > >Isn't it time we start working on the resolver-to-auth link? > > > >I know that DPRIVE does not meet in Berlin but, if people who are > >there (I'm not) want to discuss it, I'll be interested in feedbacks, > >flames and pull requests. > >
pgplPgKaZ8DTD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
