(Glad to see the interaction between Sara and Tiru; responding on just one point.)

On 8 Aug 2016, at 5:21, Sara Dickinson wrote:

With regard to the separate https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dprive- profile-and-msg-flows-01 I’ll re-iterate my question from the Yokohama WG: Is there anything DNS specific in the draft? I don’t recall anything particularly DNS specific. I definitely see value in a draft comparing message flows between TLS and DTLS in general, but my feeling is it might be better progressed though another working group with more (D)TLS experts - TLS or
UTA ?

I don't think other WG will care enough for this draft, maybe the chairs can request reviewers from the above WG’s.

I’d be interested to know what others think about this.

I disagree with Tiru: I think other WGs *will* care about it. It could go in the TLS WG, but I suspect it will get moldy there waiting for TLS 1.3 to finish. I think SAAG could take this on, or maybe spin up a short, narrow WG for it.

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to