Hi, I've posted a first rough cut of a "Padding Profile" draft, describing strategies regarding EDNS0 padding size (which we specifically did *not* address in RFC 7830):
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile-00 It's more like a "strawman proposal" rather than a polished document in the current version, but i'm more than happy to talk about it in Seoul if we have time. See the full I-D announcement below. best, Alex A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Padding Profiles for EDNS(0) Author : Alexander Mayrhofer Filename : draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile-00.txt Pages : 6 Date : 2016-10-31 Abstract: RFC 7830 specifies the EDNS0 'Padding' option, but does not specify the amount of padding to be used in specific applications. This memo lists the possible options ("Padding Profiles"), discusses the implications of each of these options, and provides implementation guidance. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile/
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
