On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:51:51AM +0000, Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote a message of 138 lines which said:
> Just to follow up on Tim’s mail. Any reviews of > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles/> > would be much appreciated to try to wind up the WGLC asap. I've read draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-07 and I've little to add to what I said in <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/qKI3hnyCDywqYqCxFIyRDkYOvIA> The points I raised there have been well addressed. I'm still a bit concerned about the issue of detection (that there is an attack). Detection for passive attacks is only possible if there is a prior history, unlike the detection for active attacks, but I have no concrete suggestion to improve table 1, while keeping it simple to read. So, it is OK for me, draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-07 can be published. Editorial: None found _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
