Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-09: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (I just updated both my DISCUSS and my comment section.) I would like to ballot YES on this document, but I would like to discuss the following: Sorry for being DownRef police, but RFC 7918 is clearly Normative (because there is a SHOULD level requirement), but it is listed as Informative reference. It would be a DownRef once it is made Normative, unless the procedure from RFC 8067 is used. Is RFC 7918 a suitable DownRef? Is it widely implemented? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am agreeing with Ekr comments. I am also agreeing on first and last Mirja's comment. Section on future DHCP extension is a bit "hand-wavy". Is any work on this planned? _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
