Hi Alex, Thanks so much for adding the Maximal Padding strategy. The section is clear, the subtitle is humorous, and the final NOT RECOMMENDED gives the strategy its place.
Regards, Hugo Connery -- Head of IT, DTU Environment, http://www.env.dtu.dk ________________________________ From: dns-privacy [dns-privacy-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Alexander Mayrhofer [alexander.mayrho...@nic.at] Sent: Thursday, 28 September 2017 16:23 To: dns-privacy@ietf.org Subject: [dns-privacy] Version -02 of draft-ietf-padding-policy Hello everyone, I’ve just posted version -02 of the Padding Policy draft. This version consideres comments from the Prague WG sesson and subsequent mailing list discussions. Specifically, the major changes are: - Changed Document status to „Experimental“ - Added „Maximum Length“ padding strategy - Reworded „Block Length“ strategy - Added text with RFC2119 language to each strategy - Provided justification for the recommended strategy. Please review and comment. I’m happy to talk about it in Singapore, and i think we should be pretty close to WGLC‘ing it out of our eyes after that :) A review by a native speaker of English would also be appreciated, since i’m pretty sure i’ve sprinkled in a bit of Engrish here and there ;) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-02 best, Alex
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
