Hi Erik, On 3/10/18 6:20 AM, Erik Kline wrote: > I'm expecting to die a thousand deaths for this question, but... > > TL;DR: Should we have some kind of URI schemes for encrypted DNS > protocols (i.e. identifying the transport)?
I had a chat with a couple of URI experts about this. Their question is whether you actually want to expose the security mechanism to the application. Their view was that there *may* be a benefit to having a dnss: URI, to go along with the dns: URI, but not one that indicates the actual mechanism (e.g., dns-tls:). I will try and get more details from them as the week goes along. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
