Hey, I action meant the work item. But then it’s of course fine. Guess I didn’t match that correctly. Thanks!
Mirja > Am 24.05.2018 um 05:28 schrieb Terry Manderson <[email protected]>: > > Hi Mirja, > > I’m going to leave them in as a back story. (I presume you mean in the intro > paragraphs.) > > If you mean in the Work Items. No. This work has not yet started. DPRIVE > activity to date has been focused on stub to recursive resolver. > > Cheers, > Terry > >> On 19 May 2018, at 00:56, Mirja Kühlewind <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-dprive-01-00: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dprive/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Aren't the first two bullet points obsolete by now? If that works is already >> concluded, I would recommend to remove them. >> >> _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
