> On Jun 1, 2018, at 16:28, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> I'm pretty sure it was correct at publication time (I think I checked it); I >> suspect they changed it. Either way, is should be marked as Verified. >> > > If the wayback machine is correct, then you are correct as well. It > looks like dnscrypt.org was valid after the publication date.
We should be much more restrained with adding external references to an RFC document. Paul _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
