Magnus,
Thanks for the review. I will await direction from the shepherding
AD as to when he would like to see this change made.Regards, Brian On 6/11/18 8:49 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > Reviewer: Magnus Westerlund > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This is a follow up to the previous review: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04-tsvart-lc-westerlund-2018-04-04/ > > Thanks for resolving the previously raised issues. > > I did notice in Section 4.1 that the following paragraph: > > The Block Size will interact with the MTU size. Especially for > length values that are a large fraction of the MTU, unless the block > length is chosen so that a multiple just fits into the MTU, Block > Length Padding may cause unneccessary fragmentation for UDP based > delivery. Also, chosing a block length larger than the MTU of course > forces to always fragment. > > Is repeated with just one paragraph between them. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
