Ben, thanks for your review and COMMENT. Responses inline below:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: No Objection > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (I might ballot "yes" on a more mature version of this as standards track or > BCP, should one be offered :-) ) > > Why is this experimental? What is the nature of the experiment? Even if it's > just to get more operational experience, it's worth saying that explicitly. The document is experimental because the recommendation is based on a single empiric study. We hope to receive more telemtry from the field once that document is in place, and the idea is indeed that a follow-up document is created once more such research becomes available. PEARG is listing DNS padding as one of the research options. > §2: There are a number of lower-case versions of normative keywords. Please > consider the boilerplate from RFC 8174. I wasn't aware of that. Great improvement - i'll use that boilerplate in the -06 version. > §A.2: ' "Fixed Length Padding" MUST NOT be used except for experimental > applications.' This entire draft is experimental. Hm. Good point. Would "test applications" solve this issue? I've changed the text accordingly now.. best, Alex _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
