Am 13.09.18 um 14:14 schrieb Willem Toorop:
> An alternative for TLSA glue could be a label in the NS name indicating
> DoT support perhaps? It's not pretty, but at least it would work right now.

Hello,

yes, a special authoritative server name was also the mechanism, DJB choose to 
publish
a curvedns server public key. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSCurve)

so why not name a authoritative server "dot{foo}.example"?
A resolver may expect by definition that this authoritative server
- is reachable on port 853/tcp
- present a certificate
- prove the certificate's content by a TLSA record served inline via 
tls-dnssec-chain as well as via 'normal' DNS
- serve zone data

-> capability signaling by name

That way it's not a requirement for a delegation zone to serve any additional 
data.

Andreas

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to