On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:20 AM Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> All, > This week (10/15 - 10/21) let's focus on the implementer's > perspective on DNS privacy between recursive resolvers and authoritative > servers. >From authoritative server perspective, but really the question can be flipped over and would apply to recursive server. - how to signal to a recursive resolver availability of privacy channel. - how to let recursive resolver authenticate authoritative servers. Manu > > This topic does not appear to have any previously stated views, so > let's work through any impacts on the code bases. > > Regards, > Brian > > On 7/19/18 2:24 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > > This thread is for discussion of the implementer perspective of DNS > > privacy between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers. > > > > - Focus on *what* is needed. > > - Avoid *how* to achieve it. > > - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. > > - Scenarios will frame the discussion. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dns-privacy mailing list > > dns-privacy@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
