On Dec 14, 2018, at 10:12 AM, A. Schulze <s...@andreasschulze.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 11.12.18 um 06:38 schrieb Mukund Sivaraman:
>> There was some discussion in last night's meeting about encoding keys in
>> the DNS name of a nameserver, similar to DNSCurve. There are at least
>> some issues with it:
>> 1...4
> 
> 5. Encoding a key as DNS name of a nameserver makes key rotation harder.
>   Not impossible, but really much harder.

More generally, encoding a key anywhere else makes key rotation harder. It 
doesn't matter if it's a NS record, an HTTP header, or a text list of current 
keys. All of these can be automated, and that automation will mostly work, and 
will cause massive problems in the rare times it doesn't. Having a second place 
to assure the value of a key is valuable, but that inherently adds some 
fragility. 'Twas always thus.

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to