Paul, On 12/03/2019 20:51, Paul Vixie wrote: > just as i've cautioned the RFC 8484 authors against imposing their anti- > censorship views on my parental controls or corporate network policies, let > me > here caution you against imposing your (clearly) western liberal-democratic > views on the development of protocols whose ideal state is "interoperability" > and never more or less.
I'm sorry but I don't understand this argument. DoH interoperates pretty well. You and Christian have expressed different concerns not related to interop. I don't see why, based on your argument, your concerns trump his. Can you explain? Thanks, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
