Please see below, I mistakenly sent it to dprive@ instead of dns-privacy@, which bounced. Please excuse if you are getting the email multiple times.
Begin forwarded message: > From: Kevin Borgolte <[email protected]> > Date: July 19, 2019 at 12:26:40 GMT+8 > To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > Subject: Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW > > Hi all, > > we recently did a study on Do53/DoT/DoH performance on webpage load times in > Firefox, which we wanted to share with you. Austin Hounsel will give a talk > about our work at ANRW on Monday. Paul Schmitt and I will also be around > (myself only Monday afternoon and Tuesday) if you’d like to chat about it in > person. The extended pre-print of our paper is available here: > https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08089 > > We looked at the effect of Do53/DoT/DoH on page load times because we figured > they will be a more interesting measure than simple DNS resolution times.. We > also looked at simulated mobile connections (4G, lossy 4G, and 3G). We found > that DoH is on par with Do53/DoT if your Internet connection is good, and > worse if it is not. The potential for DoH seems to be largely push. ADD can > also make sense, or at least an extended/updated OS API would. > > We think there are two opportunities to improve Do53 and DoT: better wire > format caching and partial responses combined with multiple questions. Part > of the improvements and issues we discovered we later found out (by talking > to some of you) were mentioned in early working group drafts, but they never > made it into published RFCs or mailing list posts (which is where we looked > initially). We hope you can help and explain the thoughts that went into > these decisions 15 to 20 years ago. Maybe it even makes sense to revisit the > ideas from back then combined with our ideas, considering how the Internet > has evolved? > > We‘d appreciate any feedback on our work. Please also feel free to reach out > to us directly (in person or by email) if you have any insight or feedback > you’d prefer not to post to the list. > > Best, > Kevin > > P.S. Please excuse the posting to multiple lists, but all seem relevant.
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
