> On 22 Jul 2019, at 21:52, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > > apparently ECS creates problems for privacy, but _how could we have > suspected_? IIRC the ECS privacy issues were recognised at the time. They lost out to the argument that CDNs were already doing (or about to do) ECS and it would be better (for some definition of better) if this was done in a way that had an RFC behind it. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Pe... Rob Sayre
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Lo... Kevin Borgolte
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Lo... Puneet Sood
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Pag... Livingood, Jason
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Add] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT ... Andrew Campling
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] [Add] Do53 vs ... Paul Vixie
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Doh] [DNSOP] [Ad... Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Doh] [DNSOP]... Paul Vixie
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Pag... Willem Toorop
- Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Lo... Rob Sayre
