Hi Paul, To further clarify, we are not suggesting a change to the DoT protocol and are making liberal use of the final sentence in the Abstract of RFC7858 and echoed in the Introduction of RFC8310: "It does not prevent future applications of the protocol to recursive-to-authoritative traffic."
Regards, Karl On 8/15/19, 4:15 PM, "Paul Hoffman" <[email protected]> wrote: On Aug 15, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Henderson, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > > To be clear, ADoT is not a new standard. This is simply DNS over TLS as specified in RFC7858, RFC 7858 makes it clear that it is for stub-to-recursive. That is called out in the Abstract and the Introduction. > further defined as ADoT in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-ter-02, That is a, um, "creative" reading of the phrase "later defined". --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
