On 12. 09. 19 7:37, Rob Sayre wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:53 AM Timm Boettger <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Rob Sayre has pointed me to this thread. I am an author of the linked > paper... > > He has pointed out some confusing and outdated information in the paper, > that I would like to clarify... > > > Let me further clarify: I thought these were minor corrections, and I didn't > want these small flaws to undermine a great point the paper made in its > Section 3: > > "Implementing out-of-order delivery via TLS is akin to (re-)implementing the > stream multiplexing part of SCTP, QUIC or HTTP/2.0."
It should be noted that out-of-order query processing is in no way unique to TLS, it is the same for TCP (see RFC 5966 section 6). It should also be noted that Knot Resolver (which I'm working on), BIND and also modern versions of Unbound _do_ support out-of-order query processing so the point above it moot. (I'm not sure about PowerDNS but I would be surprised if it did not have out-of-order processing support as well.) Missing support on a particular service is not caused by lack of implementations in servers, maybe it is a problem "added" by layers on top. Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
