Thanks Stephen (Follow up on this in another email)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:16 AM Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 31/10/2019 13:12, Sara Dickinson wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Following the DPRIVE interim meeting earlier this week I’ve done an > > update to the draft with two main changes: > > > > 1) I have remove the text around consent that did not have consensus > > i.e. paragraph 2 in section 5.3.3 and Item 6 in the DROP Practice > > statement (and in the example). I believe the chairs will follow up > > with a request to the list to gain consensus on what text (if any) > > can be agreed on wrt this topic based on the options discussed in the > > interim. > > I had a look at the diff and -05 certainly resolves my > comments on this topic. > > Thanks, > S. > > > > > > 2) I hope that all the other comments raised on the list during WGLC > > are now also addresses in this version. If I’ve missed anything > > please let me know. > > > > Best regards > > > > Sara. > > > >> On 31 Oct 2019, at 13:10, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >> directories. This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange > >> WG of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service > >> Operators Authors : Sara Dickinson Benno J. Overeinder > >> Roland M. van Rijswijk-Deij Allison Mankin Filename : > >> draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-05.txt Pages : 40 Date > >> : 2019-10-31 > >> > >> Abstract: This document presents operational, policy and security > >> considerations for DNS recursive resolver operators who choose to > >> offer DNS Privacy services. With these recommendations, the > >> operator can make deliberate decisions regarding which services to > >> provide, and how the decisions and alternatives impact the privacy > >> of users. > >> > >> This document also presents a framework to assist writers of a DNS > >> Recursive Operator Privacy Statement (analogous to DNS Security > >> Extensions (DNSSEC) Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements > >> described in RFC6841). > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op/ > >> > >> There are also htmlized versions available at: > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-05 > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-05 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-05 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > >> tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing > >> list [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > > > _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing > > list [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
