Very helpful! Some very minor feedback for any potential next version: - Add reference to draft-bretelle-dprive-dot-for-insecure-delegations-00 - Section 3, 1st para is about auth with secure delegation in conflict with the section title. Perhaps s/Authenticating an insecure delegation/Authentication and describe auth w/secure delegation briefly in a new 3.1. Alternatively, the auth w/secure delegation bit is a tiny section of it's own and what is now S3 becomes S4 with the current section title.
In preparation for IETF-106, we are tracking open Qs for WG discussion at https://github.com/alex-nicat/ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements/issues/20. Feel free to add to that. Jason On 11/4/19, 2:56 PM, "dns-privacy on behalf of John R Levine" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, John Levine wrote: > I thought it might be useful to make a list of possible ways to signal > that a server offers ADoT: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dprive-signal/ Did another version with more possibilities. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
