Brian, Thanks for your comments.
Focusing on one item: > Using bind-style syntax, I would imagine something like: Something like this would definitely be useful. It is important to observe though that there are interactions with the ability to keep things private and excessive round-robining/going-to-alternate. The second bullet in Section 3 talks about this in the draft. With that caveat, having an expressive way to define which resolvers you want to talk to is much needed. Jari _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
