On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 4:23 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Add <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell > > > > If there were sufficient interest in the above from multiple > implementers and > > operators, then I'd be in agreement with Jari. I don't think we know if > that is or is > > not the case. (Well, I don't know anyway.) >
I'm very much interested in working on the "Discovery of resolvers and their capabilities and behaviors" item and the "Support for debugging and analysis". I have some ideas that might combine those two through mechanisms that support both use cases, so it might be possible to reduce the list of items by one. (This may lead to an actual "DNS traceroute", BTW.) I'd prefer to work with 2-3 co-authors to ensure progress and good collaboration, not more and not fewer. Please contact me off-list if you are interested, presuming (a) WG formation, and (b) WG chair approval. I'm willing to contribute ideas and review the item "Local DNS caches (e.g. partitioning, use of stale records)". (I think that one is particularly important, and important to get right.) Brian
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
