> On 26 Nov 2019, at 17:35, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > So what I see is a requirement for DNS resolver configuration. We already > have rfc6763 to tell us how to get from a DNS label to an Internet service. > Albeit one that presupposes the existence of a resolution mechanism. I don't > see it being problematic to use the local DNS to do this resolution provided > that 1) we have the means to authenticate the connection and 2) we only use > this mechanism once, to perform initial configuration. > How will the connection to the local resolver be authenticated? Also, presumably this mandates the use of DNSSEC by the client? Neil _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
- Re: [dns-privacy] Tryi... Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [dns-privacy] [EXT... Winfield, Alister
- Re: [dns-privacy] [EXT... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand DNS ... Neil Cook
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand ... Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to underst... Neil Cook
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to und... Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [dns-privacy] [EXTERNA... Winfield, Alister
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand ... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand DNS resol... Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand DNS resol... Neil Cook
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand DNS ... Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand ... Neil Cook
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to underst... Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [dns-privacy] Trying to understand DNS resol... Livingood, Jason
