> On Dec 15, 2019, at 7:35 PM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So, let's back up a step: are people interested in using DHCP and RA as
>> part of the discovery story here or not?
>
> I am.
>
> I tend to think that
> https://thpts.github.io/draft-peterson-dot-dhcp/draft-peterson-dot-dhcp.html
> is a reasonable start here. Sure, it makes some assumptions, and leaves some
> of the harder 8310-style questions unanswered, but that's where I think we
> should be paying more attention anyway.
This is at least the fourth list that DoT discovery over DHCP has been
discussed (see DoH, DNSOP, and DRIU).
In the previous three times, it was rejected as not a trustworthy source.
Willem and I wrote a draft on DHCP options that was well received by DHCP
experts but not well received by DNS folks.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pusateri-dhc-dns-driu-00
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pusateri-dhc-dns-driu-00>
We presented it at IETF 102 in Montréal (July 2018). Looking at the DRIU
mailing list, both Martin Thomason and Ted Hardie were active and so you may
remember it and the poor reception it received. Our slides are here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-driu-dhcpv6-dns-discovery-00
This draft could be easily revived but that doesn’t change the objections we
received back then.
I think Ted Lemon led the charge against this. Here are his slides:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-driu-when-to-use-dhcp-00
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-driu-when-to-use-dhcp-00>
and here is the video presentation. Ted Lemon starts at 33:13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfEX8zuoRAA
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfEX8zuoRAA>
Tom
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
