Thanks to Sara and Stéphane for the -04 revised I-D.
After reading the -04, I think that most of the IETF Last Call comments are
addressed (and consensus needs to be balanced -- even for informational
document) and that the document sticks to facts.
But, as section 3.5.1 ("in the recursive resolvers") raised a lot of
discussions during the first IETF Last Call, and as the authors reacted to
those comments by deep changes in the text, let's have a new IETF Last Call
before proceeding with IESG evaluation.
Again, thank you to the reviewers and the authors
Regards,
-éric
On 20/01/2020, 22:34, "IETF Secretariat" <[email protected]>
wrote:
IESG state changed:
New State: Last Call Requested
(The previous state was Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup)
The previous last call raised several points. The authors have worked on
those points and this new informational IETF draft has substantive changes;
enough to go trigger a new IETF Last Call.
-éric
Datatracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
