On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 6:01 PM The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote:
> > The IESG has received a request from the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG (dprive) > to > consider the following document: - 'DNS Privacy Considerations' > <draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-04.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-c...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-02-03. Exceptionally, comments > may > be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document describes the privacy issues associated with the use of > the DNS by Internet users. It is intended to be an analysis of the > present situation and does not prescribe solutions. This document > obsoletes RFC 7626. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > Looks good to me. One grammar nit: 3.5.1.4.2. DoH Specific Considerations next to last paragraph "Some implementations have, in fact, chosen restrict the use of" change to: "Some implementations have, in fact, chosen to restrict the use of" -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
