Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document is trying to make normative references to sections of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis that have not existed since the -00 of that document, with the content having been removed for being too controversial. Do we need to delay processing this document until 7626bis has settled down and it is clear what content we can refer to in that vs. needing to incorporate into this document? (It's unclear that such content would be less controversial in this document than in that one.) Specifically, Section 5.1.2 of this document refers to Section 2.5.3 of that document ("Rogue Servers"). _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
