[- WG mailing list - secretariat] Dear authors [Sara no need for urgent reply],
There were little reactions during the Last Call. Do you want to issue an revised ID or simply go ahead with the current revision ? With Rob Sayre's 45 points, a revised I-D is really required (and Sara has already replied to all points, so, just need to issue the text). Hence, I am changing the state to 'revised I-D needed', then the last mile run with IESG ballot __ -éric On 03/02/2020, 20:17, "IETF Secretariat" <[email protected]> wrote: IESG state changed: New State: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup (The previous state was Waiting for AD Go-Ahead) Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
