On 2/6/20 09:08, Adam Roach wrote:
For the specific example chosen, it's been made pretty clear over the years that at least the clients for the specific service you cite have no interest in incurring this additional cost. If that's the working group consensus, then I have no interest in over-riding it. But ignoring operational realities seems kind of ivory tower-ish, which feels like the kind of thing that undermines the general credibility of the rest of the document.
I realize that my editing made one of the pronoun antecedents here go away. The second sentence should have said something more like "If keeping the current text is the working group consensus..."
/a _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
