> Il 05/03/2020 18:13 Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 8:35 AM Sara Dickinson < [email protected] > mailto:[email protected] > wrote: > > > > How about: > > > > “We do not know of a court precedent relating to the question of > > whether simply using a DNS resolution service constitutes consent from the > > user for the operator to process their query data" > > > > > > That sounds like a significant improvement to me. > > Note that "precedent" is a term used by primarily in "common law" > jurisdictions like the UK and US, so it may not be meaningful to all readers: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent#Civil_law_systems > The concept is well understood in civil law systems as well, just precedents are not (that) binding. Ciao,
-- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange [email protected] mailto:[email protected] Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
