On Mar 19, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Daniel Migault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Paul for the comment. I guess the reason for overkill is that too many > schemes are created. The reason for underspecified is that the proposed doh > scheme only reflects a subset of the parameters provided by a uri template. > On the other hand I understand that parameters of the URI template should not > be provided as part of the URI scheme. Am I correct ? >
Correct. People can't do parameters in URI schemes reliably at all. As for your earlier question about http: and https:, many people now think in retrospect that that was a well-intentioned mistake. The fact that you have so many choices in your draft shows that it will only get worse. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
