On 3/6/2020 7:30 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Thank you for continuing this interesting work. However, a reader might not > realize that many other folks would prefer DNS/HTTPS/QUIC until the get all > the way to Section 3.4. Also, the title of that section seems a bit > unbalanced, given that the text says that people might prefer DNS/HTTPS/QUIC > for reasons other than hiding from firewalls. > > For a future version of this draft, please consider moving the comparison to > DNS/HTTPS/QUIC, and the discussion of not knowing which one folks will > prefer, up to the Introduction. That would leave Section 3.4 just about the > stated design goal.
Yes. I would like to end up with just a spec, and leave the discussion about DoT vs DoQ vs DoH vs DoH3 to some other document... -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
