On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:58 PM Christian Huitema <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 5/13/2020 3:19 PM, Andrew Campling wrote: > > I also note that RFC 3552 (Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security > Considerations) includes section 2.3 on systems security so does indeed > look beyond the network. So, alongside RFC 7754 and RFC 6973, there seem > to be a good number of examples where the IETF has reached consensus on > documents with scope that extends beyond the network. I’m unclear why this > one should not. > > > Because we do not in fact have consensus on what to say. > Agree. There doesn't even seem to be consensus that this part of the document concerns security. A lot of the terms in this thread, like "user" and "security", are being stretched pretty far. Some sections of this document read more like industry advocacy than an IETF document to me. Advocacy is fine, but I am not sure it belongs in an RFC. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
