While it might be too late to debate this point, I would say the paragraph that begins with "Users will only be aware of..." and the following bullet points could be dropped. It seems to state that users can't change settings if there are no settings three times (this seems obvious). One bullet point mentions a "change in default". I do not think these settings represent a "default", although they may represent the status quo on some systems (but not all).
The third paragraph says "Application-specific changes to default destinations for users' DNS" seems to concern an OS API subject (something for POSIX etc), rather than an IETF protocol issue. thanks, Rob On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 2:26 AM IETF Secretariat < [email protected]> wrote: > IESG state changed: > > New State: IESG Evaluation > > (The previous state was Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup) > > > Datatracker URL: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
