Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Thank you for this document. I found it interesting and easy to read. A few minor comments/nits that I spotted whilst reading this document: "in clear (i.e., unencrypted)." => "unencrypted." "However there is" => "However, there is" "designed for TCP, not UDP and new" => "designed for TCP, not UDP, and new" "It can be noted also that" => "It can also be noted that" "Both are a big privacy concern" => "Both are significant privacy concerns" "de-NAT DNS queries dns-de-nat [3]" => "de-NAT DNS queries [3]"? Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
