On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:23 PM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In reading through the draft that there’s going to be unacceptable > induced latency on resolver for TLDs and authoritative domains that are > (would) not ADoT enabled. > > If a resolver decides that the increased latency is unacceptable, then it > won't use the protocol. However, that should be an operational decision for > the resolver operators to make, not forced on them by reluctant > authoritative server operators. An authoritative operator can decide not to > support ADoT if they don't want resolvers using it with their service, of > course, but not for the whole DNS. > I won't be able to attend the interim, but I think the proposal looks very reasonable. The latency / cpu penalty seems almost overstated, since I expect most of these transactions will happen over persistent connections. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
