On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 21:35 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > > I'm not one of the authors, but re-reading the draft with "intermingling" > > in focus, I think the issues are: > > - The intermingling aspect originates in RFC5936 (over TCP) > > Several people have pointed that out to me - I totally missed that > since forever. 5936 specified the intermingling in a very loose way, > though.
And just now it was pointed out to me that 7766, which updates 5936, has text like 'DNS clients MUST take care to minimize the number of concurrent TCP connections made to any individual server. It is RECOMMENDED that for any given client/server interaction there SHOULD be no more than one connection for regular queries, one for zone transfers, ...' But, it also goes on to say 'certain primary/secondary configurations with many busy zones might need to use more than one TCP connection for zone transfers for operational reasons (for example, to support concurrent transfers of multiple zones).' and I feel the XoT document is taking that to the next level :-) Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
