I support adoption. I think opportunistic encryption will help drive adoption with safe fallbacks which in turn will help building operational experience, as well as will provide opportunities for a feedback loop between implementers and operators, learn, iterate, tweak, and come with best practises that will inform long term solutions.
As someone working at an authoritative that provides ADoT [0], I would love to see more diverse adoptions than the current handful of resolver operators as the current data is currently skewed toward 1 specific use-case. Manu [0] https://engineering.fb.com/2018/12/21/security/dns-over-tls/ On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 5:24 AM Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > This starts a DPRIVE WG call for adoption for > draft-pp-recursive-authoritative-opportunistic > ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pp-recursive-authoritative-opportunistic/ > ). > The focus of the call is the protocol defined in the draft. Please reply > to the mailing list with your views on the WG adopting the document and > your supporting arguments. > > This call will end on February 12, 2021 at 11:59pm UTC. > > Regards, > Brian & Tim > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
