On Feb 23, 2021, at 11:30 AM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really want fully authenticated ADoT but I have significant concerns with > this draft.
As do the authors. > As Paul notes, this draft is so different from the previous draft that it > covers effectively a new problem space. This is surprising for an adopted > document. The authors felt backed into doing this because none of the strong proponents for fully-authenticated encryption were willing to write a draft, yet we were required to make our proposal interoperate with that proposal. As I said in my message yesterday, if the WG hates the idea of a single draft with both use cases, we are happy to back out the changes as soon as someone writes a draft that we can then match our protocol to. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
