On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:08 PM Erik Kline <[email protected]> wrote:

> From my reading the answer, and the whole document, seems to be
> summarizable in this one excerpt:
>
>     "Root Server Operators do not feel comfortable being the early
> adopters of authoritative DNS encryption and would like to first see
> increased deployment in other parts of the DNS hierarchy."
>

So, as the document says, "attention turns toward providing privacy
protection for the next step: recursive resolvers to authoritative
servers". Which part of the hierarchy should move next, then?


> Seems fair to me, for the time being.
>

The DNSSEC stuff stood out to me. Why is that even seen as something that
would help?

thanks,
Rob
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to