Greetings again. We have produced draft-ietf-dprive-opportunistic-adotq-02 
based on extensive WG feedback before, during, and after the WG meeting. A 
couple of big changes include:

- All that fully-authenticated description we added to -01 before the WG 
meeting because we didn't know that draft-rescorla-dprive-adox-latest was 
coming? We removed that from our draft and point to 
draft-rescorla-dprive-adox-latest instead.

- The WG has not agreed on any reason to do authentication in opportunistic 
resolver-to-authoritative DNS, so we removed any mention of it, and now just 
talk about unauthenticated encryption.

- We changed the signaling mechanism to SVCB to align with 
draft-rescorla-dprive-adox-latest.

- Even though -01 stated explicitly that the protocol was optional for all 
authoritative servers, it seems that people want more. We now say more and 
point to the new RootOps document.

- Given that the WG is getting close to finishing DoQ, we put DoQ on the same 
footing as DoT in the document. We added DoH because it comes for free with 
using SVCB as a signal.

Given that the document is no longer about full opportunistic encryption (just 
about unauthenticated encryption), and that it not just about DoT and DoQ, we 
propose that we change the file name to 
draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative after the WG has had some time to 
comment on this -02.

--Peter and Paul

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to