On May 12, 2021, at 18:56, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:28 PM Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You won't be able to rely on these updated for many years to come. > > I agree, but I still think this draft represents a good approach, and we > should adopt it. > > In my view, the WG has been stuck trying to choose between principled > long-term solutions that will take many years to implement, and ugly hacks > that can be deployed quickly. In fact, I think we should develop both. This > draft is the former, and if we adopt it, we can and should follow with > interim solutions that can "upgrade gracefully" over time.
The draft is proposing a fundamental change in the processing of the new proposed RR. It is a major protocol change, as opposed to simply adding a new RR TYPE that works under RFC 3597 That work should not be done in this WG. Any fundamental change in how DNS operates belongs on dnsop (well, dnsext but that role was taken on by dnsop) Paul
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
