The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC8932, "Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6629

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Joeri de Ruiter <[email protected]>
Date Reported: 2021-07-05
Held by: Eric Vyncke (IESG)

Section: B.1.

Original Text
-------------
One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port
numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the
original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (>1024).

Corrected Text
--------------
One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port
numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the
original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (<1024).

Notes
-----
Nonephemeral port numbers are <1024

--- Verifier note ---
The errata is indeed a real typo. As it is in appendix, "held for document 
update" was selected.

--------------------------------------
RFC8932 (draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-14)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators
Publication Date    : October 2020
Author(s)           : S. Dickinson, B. Overeinder, R. van Rijswijk-Deij, A. 
Mankin
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : DNS PRIVate Exchange
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to