I'm confused here. Are you saying that the DS owner name for an 
out-of-bailiwick NS would still be the name of that NS? If so, then it seems 
that you are asking the authoritative to sign a DS record for which it is not 
authoritative.

A different design that does not require signing records for which you are not 
authoritative would be to have the DS owner be that of the zone in question, 
with the DNSName in your structure being as Shane suggested.

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to