After reading the -06 somewhat carefully, I have only one question: why should 
the DNS message ID be set to 0? If there's a good reason, is should be listed 
in Section 5.2.1, but if there isn't, the requirement should be removed. As the 
text indicates, this requirement makes forwarding more difficult. It also makes 
a special case for a client implementation that can do both DoQ and DoT.

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to