On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, at 10:12, Paul Hoffman wrote: > I apologize for doing what I really dislike other people doing: writing > about a draft I have not read in a long time. I have now read -06 with > an eye towards 0-RTT, and completely agree with you that the > implementation requirements and suggestions are clear. A developer > should have no problem finding them in the document even though they > are in three places because those three places are well-labeled.
Having been more closely involved in improving this text, I agree with Paul. This is useful text. I think that Ben's push here is a laudable attempt to reduce duplication of text, particularly with the view of providing a canonical reference for early data in DNS. However, I would prefer some duplication over a less than complete DoQ specification. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
