Thanks Ben, that's a more accurate statement than mine. On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:30 PM Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:56 PM Martin Duke <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> DTLS has no invariants at all. >> > > Is this true? It seems to me that DTLS inherits TLS's implicit > compatibility guarantee: all DTLS 1.x ClientHellos must also be valid DTLS > 1.0 ClientHellos. That is a very tight invariant. > > I'm not sure if this is written down anywhere, but then this whole > "invariant" notion is very new and essentially specific to QUIC. >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
